The next installment in this seriesis eagerly awaited.” - MathSciNet Review from the first volume: “Andrews and Berndt are to be congratulated on the job they are doing. Many entries are just begging for further study and will undoubtedly be inspiringresearch for decades to come. While some of the content is taken directly from published papers, most chapterscontain new material and some previously published proofs have been improved.
Review from the second volume: “Fans of Ramanujan’s mathematics aresureto be delighted by this book. Most of the entries in number theory fall under the umbrellaofclassical analytic number theory.Perhaps the most intriguing entries are connected with the classical, unsolved circle and divisor problems. Three of thepartial manuscripts are on diophantine approximation, and others are in classical Fourier analysis and prime number theory. Several incomplete manuscripts of Ramanujan published by Narosa with the lost notebook are discussed. Most of the entries examined in this volume fall under the purviews of number theory and classical analysis. In contrast to the first three books on Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook, the fourth book does not focus on q-series. This volume is the fourth of five volumes that the authors plan to write on Ramanujan’s lost notebook. This manuscript was soon designated, “Ramanujan’s lost notebook.” Its discovery has frequently been deemed the mathematical equivalent of finding Beethoven’s tenth symphony. Among these papers, Andrews discovered a sheafof 138 pages in the handwriting of Srinivasa Ramanujan. In the spring of 1976, George Andrews of Pennsylvania State University visited the library at Trinity College, Cambridge, to examine the papers of the late G.N.
0 kommentar(er)
